| Author |
Message |
jayjayc
Member
|
# Posted: 24 Oct 2008 16:52
Reply
It is nice to have a leaderboard but I think it is not really a nice competition because:
a) it has not been refreshed that I know of, so some have been playing much longer than others
b) some play much longer per dat/week/month than others.
Couldnt (other) leaderboards be calculated, for example:
- based on average winning rate per hour or number of games played
- based on the last 1, 2 or 3 months playing
- based on the last 1000 hands you played
I also think that no reset should be possible, but that people should be allowed to go negative. Maybe this discourages reckless play a little.
|
jayjayc
Member
|
# Posted: 24 Oct 2008 16:54
Reply
How is it possible this got posted.
I wasnt even logged in and not on Internet this afternoon at the time indicated.
|
spilari
Member
|
# Posted: 24 Oct 2008 16:59
Reply
this is not the first time this happens. lol
|
VACAN23
Member
|
# Posted: 24 Oct 2008 17:17
Reply
is it fear for us that play more often ? just cause u cant play or log on more often we gotta sacrifice our chips so u can catch up ? forgive me if i understood wrong
|
kimmy
Moderator
|
# Posted: 24 Oct 2008 17:28
Reply
jayjayc
I remember you posting this following sentence on the 20th Oct the last time this thread came up....
Yes, the repetition of this post was an error, and I saw only today that somehow VISTA filling in credentials (username/password) was doing this for me.
Maybe you could go into your forum profile & change your password? It could help :)
|
lordhood
Member
|
# Posted: 24 Oct 2008 21:46
Reply
can we have a losers board say lowest 50 so at least we can feel half good when we get off it lol or at least a torny board with 1/3 places and total played or some how add are torny record to tables menu like chip total??
|
