I am kinda bored, so I will comment on in issue thats been bugging me.

A couple of months ago in the United States, I am not sure about other places. There has started to be more and more 3d movies available to see in the movie theather. Years ago watching a 3d movie was rare. In the present there are a lot of cool new features involving TV, such as blue ray disc which enchanes the image greatly. Which I dont have a problem with at all, especally when watching football. On the other hand to much of a good thing is not always good, mainly with 3d at the movie theather. I am sure a lot of people find it hard to find spare time to get out and enjoy a movie. When you go its already gonna be costly, with popcorn, tickets, etc. I am not physic, but I predict soon we wont have a choice to watch a movie in 3d, maybe all movies will be in 3d. Another question, does 3d take away from understanding the meaning of a movie, kind of a distraction when things are all up in your face lol.

Btw I am not some old man who hates technology, I am quite young lol.

Popcorn and stuff should be banned from theatres.


my left eye dominating my right eye so much,
I prolly don't see in stereovision enough for the googles to work,
so all this stuff is useless for me...

Foolme just go out and get a 3d tv then u won't need to go cinema.

Good point, kinda unsensitive to people with eye problems. May I ask though how the hell can you see flying an a cape with a mask at night. lol

Kinda missing the fundamental issue, thanks for contributing though

http://m.johnlewis.com/mt/www.johnlewis.com/Shopping/ProductCategory.aspx?ARA=Electri cals&CAT=televisions&SCT=televisions&PRT=all+tvs&PRTID=5013&OM-PageNumber=1&OM-SortOr der=0&OM-AttrString=TV+Features%7c3D+Ready+2

A link for you to bye one foolme thinking of getting the 5k one lmfao not.

Wow, I completely agree with you foolme, I think this is at least the 3rd time that has happened lately : )

Anybody with Monocular vision -also called Monopsia- it's basically impossible to view a 3D movie without getting dizzy, suffering headaches...while the screen remains mostly blurry to the viewer.

According to the American Optometric Association (AOA), one between 3 people have vision problems that made them unable to enjoy the effects of three-dimensional (3D) movies.

So if a 3rd of the populace cannot see movies in 3D...I just cannot fathom all movies being offered in this format.

It's a great way to doctor an existing movie to be shown in 3D, giving the spectator goggles; and charging up to 3 dollars more to see the same movie. Another way to charge too much for an already expensive form of entertainment.

I mostly think that they know people are waiting for movies to go to Cable, and the video stores; so they are hoping people spend their hard earned cash for the "unique" experience. Three dimensional televisions are an option to some, but not for those with a very common eye disorder.

I can't. That's why it often clash! boom! zok! kapow!

lol

back in the day, movies had to rely solely on acting and plot. Now with sophisticated special effects, movie makers can still make a buck with a flimsy story, providing only fodder for the visualist, leaving the thinking man high and dry. I've seen 5 movies (kids movies) in 3d and have enjoyed them all with the novelty of 3d assisting toward that. I found that the parts of the screen that were not in my direct line of sight were a bit blurry and I could not watch 3d for any great length of time.
The upshot for me is....if the movie is average then 3d will help put bums on seats. I personally would rather watch a great movie with a top story-line than an average 3d one. It would always be preferable to have a choice, which unfortunately, may not continue to be the case.