Howard..Tia has posted the following for team opinions. My thoughts are in italics.
These are the agenda points we would like you to contemplate and reply to.
1) We could run separate, all teams in one holdem and omaha leagues; a new twist into the league again. This gives us the option to run the leagues parallel --as the plan is to play one game every two weeks. Teams participating in both leagues then have two games in two weeks. Should be doable. Also, let us know if your team wants to play one or both leagues. If only one then tell us which one.
Generally, the simpler the better by now. The whole thing is getting so complex. If is to be an Omaha element, make it a separate league made up of any team that wants to join, whether they are also a Hold' em team or not.
1.1) We could do the following: Run the season with division 1 and 2 (holdem only); if there is 2 divisions, there is a reason for all teams to play and not lose the spirit of the league till the end. 1st division : Some teams will play for the title, some will play not to be relegated in 2nd division. 2nd Division : Some will play to reach division1 and we saw this year, that there would have been 6 teams able to get there this year. Was a nice "fight". At the end of season 2010-2011 we could have 2 winners 1 from each div or winner of div1 and winner of div2 will play the final game for the title of 'league winner 2010-2011' ?
Promotion/Demotion. The top 2 or 3 from 2nd will be promoted and bottom 2 or 3 from 1st Div relegated . This is a way to create the two divisions only.
Also, this prevents the teams, having a bad season, not to give up half way because there is nothing to win or lose. We think this is an important point. Think well about your choices. Also, there will be a separate omaha league set up with same structure.
Don't like it..too complex. Year one was fine...or add an elimination play-off round so that making the play-offs is a goal and winning them a possibility.
2) As far as rules and appeals are concerned: we best make it a one player/team committee. Again, each team nominates the representative ( does not have to be the captain). Tia will have a tie breaker vote if need arises. Other suggestions to improve the general rules should be communicated now as well.
Fine, but confidentiality might be a real problem. Is there an appeal process? A smaller elected league committee might handle ties or sensative cases. A MOD or administration rep. should be on it too.
3) We would like to hear your ideas regarding the scoring format. There are three options that would be possible. 1) as it has been, 2) as the WC has used (5 extra points for winning team) and 3) winning team scores 3 points, losing team gets 0 points (total team points are used to separate teams ending with same amount of points)
Whatever is chosen, we should eliminate anything that rewards individualistic play (eg. tourney for 'best' player based on points fails to reward players who make team plays and sacrifices). Everything else on the site is about individual play. I think I like the status quo on this one.
If the teams have other suggestions, please do add them to your comments. In principle, we will have one round of suggestions. Please take your time in discussing the teams wishes and consider carefully the points you make, we might have to live by them the coming season.
We would like to emphasize that your input is advisory. We do our best to accommodate your wishes and ideas, but in the end Tia and the working group helping her will have to make the decision. Our hope is that this way we all feel that we are part of the process to make the new season as good as we can.
Please, do submit your teams replies by the 10th of June 2010. That will give us time to incorporate your input for the new season.
Thank you all and good luck.
The mod team
Only spokespersons to post please. Thank you. |