ALL CHIPPIE DARLINGS ---
Please read the attached link regarding next season's league, ponder it, and we will set up a time on msn to discuss, or we can just discuss in email or our thread if you're comfortable with that (as some may not be available on msn). :)
http://www.thefreepokerroom.com/forum/5_6032_1.htmlI'll post my thoughts here, and we can discuss further via email, msn, or in our thread:
Personally, I do not like the idea of one big division -- if you fall behind midway, most teams will give up as it will be impossible to get ahead with so many teams in the pot, and the fun, or at least the competitiveness or ambition, would be gone for those teams. With two divisions, we all reach for playoffs, and with fewer opponents, you can still reach your goal even if you are far behind midway through.
I believe by certain individuals calling it a minor and major league (or the 2nd division a loser's division) earlier in some threads is unnecessary and inaccurate, only planting a seed that doesn't need to be there (I noticed all initially calling it that were in the first division). Personally, it wouldn't matter to me whether I was in the first or second division -- I'm only here to play and have fun with friends.
As it stands, it is nothing more than a way to create the two divisions, in my eyes -- it's not about minor or major anything -- and we all start the new season on equal footing, all playing for the same goal -- the playoffs. So my view is two divisions.
Omaha as a separate league is fine with me -- either or, actually. Whether it's included in original league or separate doesn't matter to me. Same structure for an omaha league if there are enough teams for two divisions, or one division if there are fewer teams.
I also think the point system is fine the way it is -- I find the extra 5 points to the winning team pointless (no pun intended). I realize the WC has adopted this, but the league has worked great with the existing point system for 2 seasons now -- and it's about team play -- striving to get the best points from every game, even if you don't win that particular match. A 20 vs. 19 win keeps it close and focuses on what the league is about -- team play. Adding 5 to that 20 doesn't make sense to me.
The league has worked wonderfully so far -- I see no reason to change this.
My thoughts. What are yours?